In England and Wales, it is unwanted conduct of a sexual nature which has the purpose or effect of violating the victim’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for the victim.
The victim also has protection from being treated less favourably because they have rejected or submitted to unwanted conduct of a sexual nature. See the answer to the question about prohibited retaliation below.
Separately there is protection for harassment related to sex (gender) and sexual orientation, gender reassignment as well as other protected characteristics. The scope of this Q&A is to consider sexual harassment as set out above.
The Equality Act 2010 applies to most sexual harassment which occurs in the workplace or is related to employment. The Protection From Harassment Act 1997 may also be relevant but is intended to apply where any harassment or conduct occurs generally and not specifically related to work or employment.
See the answer to the first question above. Sexual harassment typically is associated with unwanted conduct or behavior of a sexual nature which violates dignity or creates an intimidating or degrading environment.
A wide range of actions can therefore constitute sexual harassment, but common examples include:
Yes. Most complaints regarding harassment involve members of the opposite sex but there is no requirement for this.
In most cases, employers are vicariously liable for the actions of their employees and so, where sexual harassment occurs at work or is related to work, usually the victim will raise a complaint or pursue a claim against the employer as well as the individual perpetrator.
Having completed sexual harassment training and/or having anti-harassment policies in place will help an employer in defending harassment claims.
Damages in England and Wales are typically compensatory rather than punitive. As such, an employee is entitled to recover any financial loss they have suffered as a result of sexual harassment. If the employee has remained in work, there will often be no loss and so limited compensation (see below).
If the employee resigns following an incident of sexual harassment, or the incident involves the termination of their employment, they will suffer a loss of salary. The employee is entitled to pursue compensation for this loss – which will usually be the lost net salary from the date of termination until a time when it can be expected that they will find a new role of equivalent remuneration with a new employer. There is no cap that applies to this compensation and it is not unusual for employees to seek many years’ worth of lost salary where they allege sexual harassment.
In addition, employees that have suffered sexual harassment are entitled to seek compensation for “injury to feelings”. The compensation to be awarded for injury to feelings falls within three bands:
The value of the bands has recently been increased as follows:
The employer and any personal defendant will be liable for any compensation awarded on a joint and several basis – meaning that the successful claimant would be entitled to recover 100% of the compensation from any of the respondents. Typically, the employer is the target in this respect as they will be more likely to be able to pay the compensation.
Employees who believe they have been sexually harassed must show that (1) the perpetrator engaged in unwanted conduct of a sexual nature and that (2) the behaviour had either the purpose or effect of either violating their dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.
The employee does not need to have made the perpetrator aware that the conduct was unwanted.
When considering what effect the behaviour had, the Employment Tribunal (the courts in England and Wales that hear complaints of sexual harassment in the workplace) will take into account the victim’s subjective view. However, the Employment Tribunal will also consider whether it is reasonable for the conduct to have that effect.
A one-off incident is enough to establish sexual harassment. The employee does not need to establish a course of conduct.
In short, no. For the purposes of the legislation in England and Wales, an employer is usually vicariously liable for the acts of an employee in the course of their employment (subject to the employer establishing a successful defence, as discussed below). The seniority of the employee is not a relevant consideration.
An employee who is subject to sexual harassment can bring their claim against the individual perpetrator and/or their employer. An employer will have a defence against a claim for sexual harassment if it can show that it took “all reasonable steps” to prevent the employee from carrying out the offending behaviour or from doing anything of that description.
The employer must have taken these steps before the harassment occurred. Relying on its response to an employee’s complaint of sexual harassment will not be enough to successfully defend a claim.
The Employment Tribunal will consider (1) the steps the employer took and (2) other steps it was reasonable for the employer to take, when deciding if the employer is vicariously liable for the acts of its employees.
Therefore, employers should take steps to protect themselves in this respect, which is discussed further below.
Not relevant in England and Wales.
Employers should proactively take steps to prevent behaviours which amount to sexual harassment. These will usually include:
The Employment Tribunal have made clear that simply having a policy in place will not be enough to defend claims of sexual harassment. Employers must ensure staff are informed and policies are effectively implemented.
No. Pregnancy and maternity are not relevant for the purposes of establishing sexual harassment.
However, employees do benefit from other protections against discrimination on the grounds of pregnancy and maternity.
Yes. Sexual harassment in England and Wales relates to unwanted conduct of a sexual nature and will apply regardless of the sexual orientation of the harasser or the victim.
Harassment related to sexual orientation is also prohibited.
Retaliation in England and Wales is known as “victimisation”. Employers are prohibited from subjecting someone to a detriment (i.e. disadvantaging them) because they have or intend to (or are suspected of having or intending to):
Protection does not apply to individuals who have made false statements in bad faith. However, those who have made false statements in good faith will be protected from victimisation.
Additionally, there is protection for victims of sexual harassment from being treated less favourably either because they have rejected or submitted to the sexual harassment. For example, if an employee rejects the sexual advances of her boss and is then turned down for a promotion because of her rejection, she will have been treated less favourably.
For sexual harassment to be established in England and Wales, the conduct must be unwanted. It must also be established that it was reasonable for the complainant to consider the conduct to have the effect of creating an intimidating, hostile etc. environment. Whilst a complaint of sexual harassment could arise even where there is a consensual relationship, it may be more difficult to establish that the conduct was unwanted or that it was reasonable for the complainant to consider it had such effect.
Potentially, yes. Currently there is uncertainty as to when liability for harassment by third parties will arise. In circumstances where an employer was on notice of the risks of harassment (e.g. where there have been previous complaints about the actions of a client) and has failed to take appropriate action, there is a reasonable prospect that the employer will be found at fault.
In any event, employers can take steps to avoid liability (or harassment occurring in the first place) which would include: having a policy on harassment; notifying third parties that harassment is unlawful and will not be tolerated (for example by displaying a public notice); express terms in contracts with third parties requiring them to adhere to the harassment policy; encouraging employees to report incidents and taking appropriate action to deal with a complaint.
The #MeToo movement has been used by victims of sexual harassment (both male and female) to support one another and to make it clear to the wider society that such behaviour will not be suffered in silence. It has been widely used on social media and in the wider media for victims of sexual harassment to share their experiences and lend support to others. It has highlighted the prevalence of sexual harassment, particularly in the workplace.
Currently there has been no legislative change, however the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has made a number of recommendations to the UK Government to introduce new laws.
The EHRC issued a report on 27 March 2018 which followed a call for evidence in relation to sexual harassment in the workplace. Its recommendations include mandatory duties on employers to protect employees from harassment and victimisation and uplifts on compensation to be awarded for non-compliance. The EHRC has also suggested that the time limits for bringing complaints in an Employment Tribunal should be increased from three months (from the last act of harassment or last in a series of such acts) to six months and for time to run, where appropriate, from the exhaustion of any internal complaints procedures. With the UK Government busy with Brexit negotiations, it is difficult to anticipate what steps may be implemented and in what timescale.
Also, again whilst there has no change in the law, the use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) has come under scrutiny in the wake of the #MeToo movement particularly as a result of concerns that alleged victims of harassment by Harvey Weinstein had been asked to sign NDAs, with the effect that allegations were suppressed, and the alleged harassment could continue undeterred. Use of NDAs in sexual harassment situations therefore now carries the risk of further adverse publicity and criticism for employers.
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) issued a warning notice on 12 March 2018 on the use of NDAs with the effect that inappropriate use of NDAs could amount to professional misconduct for lawyers. The SRA are particularly concerned that NDAs are not used in a manner that could result in suppression of complaints to law enforcement agencies. As a result, lawyers are expected to take extra care when advising on NDAs (whether standalone or in a settlement agreement) and to ensure they are not used inappropriately.